Skip to main content

State v. Pitts.

Citations

  • 131 Haw. 537
  • 319 P.3d 456
  • 2014 WL 235462
  • 2014 Haw. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating and remanding without engaging in harmless error analysis for deprivation of the constitutional right to counsel during “critical stage[s]” of post-verdict motion proceeding and sentencing
  • raising the issue of the right to counsel for post-verdict motions sua sponte on certiorari “because the right to counsel is an essential component of a fair trial” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • denial of right to counsel affects defendants’ ability to defend their “interests on a level playing field”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, Pollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.