Skip to main content

State v. Pitt

Citations

  • 891 A.2d 312
  • 390 Md. 697
  • 2006 Md. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Mezzanatto because in Pitt the defendant's statements were used in the prosecution's case-in-chief, and noting that applying Mezzanatto \would undermine\ prior Maryland case law holding (continued
  • distinguishing Mezzanatto because in Pitt the defendant's statements were used in the prosecution's case-in-chief, and noting that applying Mezzanatto \would undermine\ prior Maryland case law holding (continued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Greene, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.