State v. Pinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• so concluding where “at the time of the interview [the defendant] had been handcuffed and taken to the front porch. As a result, [the] interrogation was custodial[.]”
• testimony regarding Pinson's silence in response to a specific question from police was direct comment on silence that prosecutor exploited by arguing that the silence was \evidence of his guilt.\
• prosecutor improperly used defendant’s silence during a 8 custodial interrogation as evidence of guilt
• prosecutor improperly used defendant’s silence during a custodial interrogation as evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State Of Washington v. Jeremiah Teas
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-08-20· cited 33×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Emery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-06-14· cited 1,088×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Glasmann
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 436×
• State v. McKenzie
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 321×
• State v. Monday
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 317×
• Salinas v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 291×
• State v. Easter
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 264×
• State v. Bennett
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-08-30· cited 210×
• State v. Burke
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 121×
• State v. Heritage
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-08-05· cited 98×
• State v. Knapp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-27· cited 19×