State v. Pigg
Citations
- 80 Kan. 481
- 103 P. 121
- 1909 Kan. LEXIS 97
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Preliminary ExAMiNATiON-Jhwposes — Effect of Waiver on Introduction of Evidence. The purpose of a preliminary examination is threefold: (1) To inquire concerning the commission of crime and the connection of the accused with it, in order that he may be informed of the nature and character of ,the crime charged against him, and, if there be probable cause for believing him guilty, that the state may take the necessary steps to bring him to trial; (2) to perpetuate testimony; (3) to determine the amount of bail which will probably secure the attendance of the accused to answer the charge. The right of the state to introduce evidence at a preliminary examination can not be defeated by the accused waiving an examination.</p> <p>2. - Court of Topeka — Jurisdiction. The act creating the court of Topeka (Laws 1899, ch. 129) confers upon the judge of that court the power and jurisdiction of a justice of the peace in preliminary examinations of persons accused of felony.</p> <p>3. - Transcript — Subsequent Attestation. Where the clerk of a city court has failed to sign the certificate attached to the transcript of a preliminary examination held before the judge of such court it is proper for the district court to permit the certificate to be amended by having the clerk attach his signature.</p> <p>4. Larceny — Identification of Property. In a prosecution for larceny, where the money described in the information and claimed to have been stolen is introduced in evidence and exhibited to the jury, it is not necessary that the particular bills should be identified as the ones described in the information.</p> <p>5. - Judicial Notice of Value of Money. Courts take judicial cognizance of the value of money. In a prosecution for the larceny of certain United States treasury notes and national bank notes, where the particular bills which it is claimed were stolen are offered in evidence, proof of their value is unnecessary.</p> <p>é. - Title of St
Judges: Porter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People Ex Rel. Daley v. MoranIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-01-04· cited 68×
- State v. OswaldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-07-14· cited 56×
- State v. JakewaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 48×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 37×
- State v. TrudellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-04-29· cited 34×
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-12-13· cited 25×
- State v. MassengillNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-01-04· cited 22×
- State Ex Rel. Whitehead v. Vescovi-DialNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-10-23· cited 19×
- State v. MelendrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1945-05-15· cited 18×
- State v. HowlandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-03-08· cited 18×
- State v. HandrubSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-03-10· cited 15×
- State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-11-06· cited 13×
- State v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Kansas· 1924-07-05· cited 13×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1934-10-06· cited 8×
- William H. Engling v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State PenitentiaryTenth Circuit· 1966-03-01· cited 6×
- Brown v. LarimerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1931-01-10· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 45×
- State v. WigginsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1898-03-07· cited 24×
- State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-06-07· cited 20×
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-12-01· cited 18×
- Ector v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1904-07-12· cited 11×
- State v. MoonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-04-08· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Guion v. BrunotSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1900-11-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.