State v. Moon
Citations
- 71 Kan. 349
- 80 P. 597
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 143
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Grand Larceny — Preliminary Examination — Notice of Offense Charged. A person charged with a felony must take notice from the evidence introduced by the state on the preliminary examination, as well as from the papers in the case, of the nature and character of the offense charged against him, and it is not necessary that such papers be prepared with the fullness of detail and technical accuracy of an information.</p> <p>2. Practice, Supreme Court — Journal Entry Contradicted by Bill of Exceptions. Entries upon the journal of the court showing a waiver of arraignment and plea of not guilty after an amendment of the information had been made will control a recitation in the bill of exceptions indicating that the amendment was made after plea.</p> <p>3. Evidence — Cross-examination—Case Followed. The rule anounced in the case of The State v. Sorter, 52 Kan. 531, 34 Pac. 1036, relating to the cross-examination of its own witnesses by the state in a criminal case, followed and applied.</p> <p>4. Practice, District CouRT-^Reopening Case — New Testimony. The conduct of the district court in this action in opening the case after the evidence had closed, and admitting testimony by a witness- who had been arrested for perjury and confined in jail on account of false swearing when placed on the witness-stand by the state in making its case in chief, approved.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court did not abuse its discretion in reopening case to allow newly discovered impeachment testimony after evidence was closed
- district court did not abuse its discretion in reopening case to allow newly discovered impeachment testimony after evidence was closed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PiggSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-07-03· cited 22×
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-15· cited 21×
- State v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-07-06· cited 14×
- State v. TerrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-10-07· cited 9×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08· cited 8×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-03-06· cited 5×
- Nuzum v. SpringerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-04-08· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.