Skip to main content

State v. Pierce

Citations

  • 263 Or. App. 515
  • 333 P.3d 1069
  • 2014 WL 2608459
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that similar agreement allowed the defendant to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress
  • noting that we review alleged judicial bias “under a realistic appraisal of psychological tendencies and human weaknesses” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • noting that we review alleged judicial bias “under a realistic appraisal of psychological tendencies and human weaknesses” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • explaining that neither ORS 14.210(1)(d
  • explaining that neither ORS 14.210(1)(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, Nakamoto, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.