State v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause the state invited the trial court to rule on the [MJOA’s] merits, we likewise find no reason not to consider defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Cervantes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
• State v. Roper
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-06-12· cited 10×
• State v. Werdell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-26· cited 7×
• State v. Brust
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-17· cited 6×
• State v. Mathie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-10-12· cited 3×