State v. Brust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaching the merits of defendant’s argument with respect to an untimely MJOA where the state did not object to the motion as untimely and where the trial court had the opportunity to rule, and did rule, on the merits of the parties’ contentions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
• State v. Crampton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-15· cited 14×
• State v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-03-15· cited 1×
• State v. Ovens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-10
• State v. Sepelak
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
• State v. Cervantes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
• State v. Vasquez-Rubio
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-07· cited 86×
• State v. Vasquez-Rubio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-07· cited 12×
• State v. Willy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-10-30· cited 10×
• Southwood Homeowners Ass'n v. City Council of Philomath
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-20· cited 9×
• State v. Gerlack
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-09-02· cited 6×