State v. Phillips
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1235
Syllabus
The trial court erred by accepting appellant's guilty plea without strictly complying with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c). The trial court did not inform appellant that, by pleading guilty, he was giving up the right to compulsory process to obtain witnesses to testify on his behalf. The trial court's question whether appellant understood he was waiving his right to present any defenses did not reasonably inform appellant that he had the right to utilize the court's subpoena power to compel witnesses to appear and testify on his behalf. Judgment reversed.
Judges: Boggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-05· cited 330×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×
- State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-14· cited 71×
- State v. YontzOhio Supreme Court· 2022-08-11· cited 6×
- State v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-25· cited 4×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.