Skip to main content

State v. Phillips

Citations

  • 313 Or. App. 1
  • 493 P.3d 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court did not err because “there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the giving of the initial aggressor instruction”
  • concluding that the trial court did not err because “there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the giving of the initial aggressor instruction”
  • considering whether the evidence was sufficient to support “a jury finding” that the defendant was the “initial aggressor”
  • considering whether the evidence was sufficient to support “a jury finding” that the defendant was the “initial aggressor”
  • “The term ‘aggressor’ has long been a legal term of art used with the criminal defense of self-defense.”
  • “[P]rovocation by mere words, if unaccompanied by any overt act of hostility will not cause a person to be an initial aggressor.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.