Washington Supreme Court· 9/4/2009
State v. Philips
Citations
- 741 P.2d 24
- 108 Wash. 2d 627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The mere fact that evidence admissible against one defendant would not be admissible against a codefendant if the latter were tried alone does not necessitate severance . . .\
- “[T]he verdicts show that the jury in fact did compartmentalize the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dore, Utter, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Andersen, Callow, Goodloe, Durham, Cunningham, Tern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
- State v. RienhardtArizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 164×
- State v. BythrowWashington Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 129×
- State v. SaasWashington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 83×
- State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-10-30· cited 58×
- Reeves v. TeuscherNinth Circuit· 1989-08-10· cited 47×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 45×
- State v. IsraelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 42×
- State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-01-14· cited 41×
- State v. ArgoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-06· cited 36×
- Cellular Engineering, Ltd. v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 35×
- Shinn v. Thrust IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-02-12· cited 33×
- State v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-12-14· cited 21×
- Aventa Learning, Inc. v. K12, Inc.W.D. Washington· 2011-11-08· cited 21×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-28· cited 16×
- State v. KramerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-03-05· cited 5×
- State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-02· cited 3×
- State v. SaasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-09-17· cited 2×
- Merle v. TeuscherNinth Circuit· 1989-08-10· cited 1×
- Michael Mariani, V. State Of Wa, Dept. Of Financial InstitutionsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-05-05
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 2,478×
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 1,616×
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 908×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1973-02-01· cited 399×
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 327×
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-05· cited 245×
- State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court· 1982-08-24· cited 215×
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 186×
- State v. CrenshawWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-17· cited 163×
- United States v. John DoeNinth Circuit· 1981-04-02· cited 161×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1968-10-29· cited 134×
- Robert Walberg v. Thomas IsraelSeventh Circuit· 1985-07-01· cited 107×
- United States v. CarmanNinth Circuit· 1978-06-23· cited 96×
- United States v. Lawrence Salvatore IorizzoSecond Circuit· 1986-03-11· cited 92×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of RichardsonWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-29· cited 79×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1984-03-15· cited 77×
- Amfac Mortgage Corp. v. Arizona Mall of Tempe, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1978-10-03· cited 74×
- Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. Securities & Exchange CommissionNinth Circuit· 1960-11-23· cited 69×
- United States v. AustinTenth Circuit· 1972-06-26· cited 56×
Other cases named State v. Philips
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.