· 2/12/1990
Shinn v. Thrust IV, Inc.
Citations
- 786 P.2d 285
- 56 Wash. App. 827
- 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the business judgment rule does not apply when corporate officer breached “specific contractual duties”
- noting that even though state securities laws should be harmonized with parallel federal laws when possible, significant differences exist between the purposes of federal and state securities laws
- an oral opinion is not itself the judgment, and cannot be used to impeach or contradict unambiguous written finding
- an oral opinion is not itself the judgment and cannot be used to impeach or contradict unambiguous written findings
- business judgment rule did not apply to protect general partner from liability where limited partners sued general partner for breach of fiduciary duty to partnership
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.