Skip to main content
· 2/12/1990

Shinn v. Thrust IV, Inc.

Citations

  • 786 P.2d 285
  • 56 Wash. App. 827
  • 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the business judgment rule does not apply when corporate officer breached “specific contractual duties”
  • noting that even though state securities laws should be harmonized with parallel federal laws when possible, significant differences exist between the purposes of federal and state securities laws
  • an oral opinion is not itself the judgment, and cannot be used to impeach or contradict unambiguous written finding
  • an oral opinion is not itself the judgment and cannot be used to impeach or contradict unambiguous written findings
  • business judgment rule did not apply to protect general partner from liability where limited partners sued general partner for breach of fiduciary duty to partnership

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.