State v. Peyton
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8253
Syllabus
After conducting a review of the record as prescribed by Anders, we find no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Contrary to Appellant's claim otherwise, the totality of the circumstances indicate that the trial court substantially complied with its obligation under Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) to determine that Appellant understood the nature of the charge against him before accepting his no contest plea. Affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1979-11-14· cited 195×
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-18· cited 32×
- State v. McDanielOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-06· cited 27×
- State v. BlairOhio Court of Appeals· 1998-06-19· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.