Skip to main content

State v. Peyton

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8253

Syllabus

After conducting a review of the record as prescribed by Anders, we find no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Contrary to Appellant's claim otherwise, the totality of the circumstances indicate that the trial court substantially complied with its obligation under Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) to determine that Appellant understood the nature of the charge against him before accepting his no contest plea. Affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.