State v. Mayes

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 9313

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's counsel filed a brief under the authority of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) with Defendant-appellant, thereafter, filing a pro se brief. Defendant-appellant's pro se assignment of errors are barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and, thus, lack arguable appellate merit. Further, having undertaken an independent evaluation of the appellate record, there are no non-frivolous issues for review in this case. Judgment affirmed.