Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/19/1978
State v. Peters
Citations
- 248 S.E.2d 475
- 271 S.C. 498
- 1978 S.C. LEXIS 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding probable cause existed to conduct warrantless search of vehicle based on Carroll doctrine where police stopped vehicle after receiving information from confidential informant that defendant was driving vehicle containing marijuana
- finding an informant’s tip that a yellow Grand Prix with a white top and South Carolina tags bearing the digits “308” would be leaving Folly Beach shortly and transporting marijuana was sufficient to constitute probable cause to stop the vehicle
- finding an informant's tip that a yellow Grand Prix with a white top and South Carolina tags bearing the digits \308\ would be leaving Folly Beach shortly and transporting marijuana was sufficient to constitute probable cause to stop the vehicle
- “In dealing with probable cause, ... as the very name implies, we deal with probabilities. These are not technical; they are the factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rhodes, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RoperSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-11-14· cited 52×
- State v. DupreeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-09-18· cited 43×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-07-21· cited 41×
- State v. BultronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 40×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-04· cited 39×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-09-10· cited 16×
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-02-06· cited 15×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 14×
- In Re Interest of Thomas B.D.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-02· cited 10×
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-11-02· cited 10×
- State v. FerrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-01-07· cited 9×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-05-13· cited 9×
- State v. HugginsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-30· cited 7×
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-06· cited 5×
- State v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-21· cited 5×
- State v. DeanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-05-01· cited 3×
- State of South Carolina v. KeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-13
- State of South Carolina v. KeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-09-02
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.