Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 5/3/2011
State v. Peter
Citations
- 798 N.W.2d 552
- 2011 Minn. App. LEXIS 50
- 2011 WL 1642521
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]he conduct in T.L.S. was non-expressive conduct unrelated to any substantive message”
- explaining that T.L.S. “involved a juvenile who was loudly shrieking[] [and] screaming profanities in a school building” and stating that such conduct was “unrelated to any substantive message” otherwise conveyed by the juvenile’s speech
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harten, Klaphake, Minge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 2011-03-02· cited 867×
- Baribeau v. City of MinneapolisEighth Circuit· 2010-02-24· cited 211×
- Matter of Welfare of S. L. J.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-02-17· cited 69×
- State v. MacHholzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-01-22· cited 49×
- In Re the Welfare of T.L.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-05-09· cited 17×
- In Re the Welfare of M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-12-30· cited 16×
- State, City of Minneapolis v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-09-02· cited 11×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-12-13· cited 10×
- In Re the Welfare of W.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-03-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.