State, City of Minneapolis v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on evidence that “the confrontation between appellant and the police” drew a crowd and that “the officers testified that appellant’s language had the effect of inciting that crowd” to sustain a conviction of disorderly conduct under the city ordinance
• applying harmless error rule to error in jury instructions
• upholding conviction when defendant’s speech incited a club-brandishing crowd

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).