Skip to main content

State v. Perry

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 487

Syllabus

Sufficiency manifest weight R.C. 2925.11(A)/possession of drugs R.C. 2923.24(A)/criminal tools R.C. 2941.25/allied offenses. Based on the totality of the circumstances and the witness testimony, there was sufficient evidence to support appellant's convictions and forfeiture of appellant's property appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's counsel's decision to admit the video as trial tactic and strategy does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel. Appellant's constructive possession of two types of drugs constitutes two separate offenses and do not merge as allied offenses of similar import.

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.