Connecticut Appellate Court· 4/18/2000
State v. Perez
Citations
- 57 Conn. App. 385
- 748 A.2d 384
- 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- alleging that previous relationship with counsel prevented effective communication of appropriate legal advice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Seattle Lake Shore & Eastern Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court· 1996-01-16· cited 70×
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-29· cited 66×
- State v. HermannConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-05-23· cited 38×
- State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-08-22· cited 34×
- Myers v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-03-06· cited 33×
- Raymond v. Rock Acquisition Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-15· cited 18×
- State v. SpenceConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-10-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.