Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/18/2018

State v. Perez

Citations

2018 Ohio 1956

Syllabus

No abuse of discretion in denying appellant's motion for continuance. Crim.R. 29 motion properly denied where sufficient evidence satisfies elements of felonious assault. Trial court complied with sentencing criteria under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12. Appellant failed to show conviction was against manifest weight because evidence was competent and credible and supported the verdict and conviction.

Judges: Singer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Skiles
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-29
State v. Hayes
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-06
State v. Wright
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
Ungar v. Sarafite
Supreme Court· 1964-05-04· cited 1,845×
State v. Unger
Ohio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
State v. Arnett
Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
State v. Shane
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-05-13· cited 535×
State v. Walker
Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-07-26· cited 274×
State v. Leech
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-09· cited 12×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.