Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/12/2024

State v. Pena

Citations

2024 Ohio 515

Syllabus

Motion to suppress Warrantless search Exigent circumstances. The trial court did not err in overruling defendant-appellant's motion to suppress, as the warrantless entry into appellant's home was justified by exigent circumstances.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Katz v. United States
Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
Payton v. New York
Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
Mincey v. Arizona
Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
State v. Burnside
Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
Welsh v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
Michigan v. Tyler
Supreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
State v. Roberts
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 348×
Michigan v. Clifford
Supreme Court· 1984-01-11· cited 346×
United States v. Errol MacDonald
Second Circuit· 1990-10-01· cited 177×
State v. Bethel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-13· cited 9×
State v. Reilly
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-09· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.