Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/16/1975
State v. Pena
Citations
- 541 P.2d 406
- 25 Ariz. App. 80
- 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, for the purpose of showing a voluntary waiver, a statement in a release order signed by a defendant advising him as to his 3 STATE v. COLLINS Decision of the Court right to be present and warning him trial will proceed in his absence is sufficient
- “[T]here is no requirement that the court make a specific determination prior to beginning a proceeding in defendant’s absence that his absence is voluntary especially where the record is clear that Rule 9.1 is applicable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobson, Haire, Eubank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LeMasterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-12· cited 64×
- State v. TudgayArizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-09· cited 30×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-05· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-01-17· cited 13×
- State of Arizona v. Analysya ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-09-23· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Steven Ricardo VallejoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-06-18
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.