State v. Pearce
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2617
Syllabus
The trial court did not error in sentencing appellant to consecutive prison terms as the court properly considered the principles and purposes of felony sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors of R.C. 2929.12. Furthermore, the court's decision to run those sentences consecutively to one another, was not error where the trial court made the necessary consecutive sentencing findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and the record supported those findings.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. AhlersOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-09· cited 107×
- State v. JuliousOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-05· cited 69×
- State v. HarpOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 60×
- State v. SettyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-02· cited 48×
- State v. DillonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-04· cited 40×
- State v. StamperOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-23· cited 34×
- State v. BrandenburgOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 25×
- State v. SessOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-29· cited 21×
- State v. BoggsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.