Skip to main content

State v. Pearce

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2617

Syllabus

The trial court did not error in sentencing appellant to consecutive prison terms as the court properly considered the principles and purposes of felony sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors of R.C. 2929.12. Furthermore, the court's decision to run those sentences consecutively to one another, was not error where the trial court made the necessary consecutive sentencing findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and the record supported those findings.

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.