State v. Peak

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 2569

Syllabus

Guilty plea withdraw presentence Crim.R. 32.1 scope of hearing claim of innocence change of heart Crim.R. 11 consecutive sentence findings R.C. 2929.14(C) supported by the record R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea. The trial court's hearing sufficiently addressed the appellant's unsupported claims of innocence where appellant also conceded that he had competent counsel, he was afforded a full Crim.R. 11 hearing, and he had a change of heart. Additionally, the record reflects the trial court made the consecutive-sentence findings under R.C. 2929.14(C) and we cannot clearly and convincingly find the record does not support the findings.