Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/23/2022
State v. Patton
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3350
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding hearsay testimony objected to by the State during trial. Further, the trial court's exclusion of the testimony did not affect appellant's substantial rights because the same testimony was later admitted into evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court· 1993-07-07· cited 1,996×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court· 1967-03-01· cited 556×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 262×
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court· 2003-06-11· cited 213×
- State v. DuncanOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 165×
- State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 163×
- State v. BradyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-11· cited 146×
- United States v. HendersonSixth Circuit· 2010-11-19· cited 138×
- State v. GilmoreOhio Supreme Court· 1986-12-26· cited 98×
- State v. SwannOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-01· cited 31×
- Abrams v. AbramsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-16· cited 15×
- HSBC Bank U.S.A., Natl. Assn. v. GillOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-10· cited 15×
- State v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.