Skip to main content

State v. Patton

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3350

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding hearsay testimony objected to by the State during trial. Further, the trial court's exclusion of the testimony did not affect appellant's substantial rights because the same testimony was later admitted into evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.