Skip to main content

State v. Patton

Citations

  • 593 S.W.2d 913
  • 1979 Tenn. LEXIS 534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a jury is not required to accept testimony of a psychiatrist on the issue of sanity to the exclusion of lay testimony or to the exclusion of evidence of the actions of the petitioner inconsistent with insanity”
  • noting that a psychiatrist’s testimony opened the door to the state’s being able to cross-examine the defendant about specific instances of conduct
  • noting that a psychiatrist’s testimony opened the door to the state’s being able to cross-examine the defendant about specific instances of conduct
  • reiterating that the State may not elicit character or reputation testimony about the defendant during its case-in-chief and that the defendant must open the door to evidence of his character or reputation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper, Brock, Harbison, Henry, Fones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.