New Mexico Court of Appeals· 3/18/1986
State v. Parsons
Citations
- 717 P.2d 99
- 104 N.M. 123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a 9 violation of a condition of probation need not be proved beyond a reasonable 10 doubt
- stating that evidence establishing non-compliance with a 14 condition of probation is sufficient to justify a finding that the failure was willful 15 unless the defendant comes forward with evidence to excuse the non-compliance
- ‘‘Was the trial court required to adopt find- ings of fact or indicate in the record its determination of whether defendant had the ability to pay sums ordered and whether defendant’s failure to pay was [wilful]? We answer the question in the affirmative.’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donnelly, Minzner, Garcia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-05-09· cited 106×
- In re Bruno R.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-02-10· cited 72×
- Del Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-12-15· cited 55×
- State v. JensenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-11-06· cited 31×
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-07-10· cited 28×
- State v. WhitakerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-02-06· cited 22×
- State v. CarrascoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-11-07· cited 11×
- Badura v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-06-05· cited 8×
- WINBUSH v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-11-29· cited 7×
- State v. ParkerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-11-24· cited 4×
- State v. BowieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-06-14· cited 3×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 620×
- Michelson v. MichelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-06-22· cited 52×
- State v. BrusenhanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-02-16· cited 49×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-04-15· cited 29×
- State v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-05-02· cited 24×
- State v. FollisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-06-19· cited 22×
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-09-20· cited 20×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-10-06· cited 17×
- Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-03-13· cited 16×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-08-22· cited 8×
- Medlock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-06· cited 7×
- Stuard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1984-05-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.