Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/29/1981
State v. Parras
Citations
- 630 P.2d 410
- 52 Or. App. 1071
- 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2883
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where state raised theory of admissibility on appeal that it had no opportunity to present because trial court initially ruled in its favor, issue properly could be presented on remand
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette, Roberts, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court· 1975-10-16· cited 89×
- Morley v. MorleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-03-22· cited 14×
- State v. HickmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-05-12· cited 6×
- State v. ParrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-11-26· cited 5×
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court· 1969-03-12· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.