State v. Parras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a “generalized concern” that “someone” might interfere with a parked car does not constitute exigent circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-09· cited 15×
• State v. J. C. L.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 6×
• State v. Gorham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-23· cited 5×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-27· cited 3×
• State v. Sargent
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-06· cited 2×
• State v. Gilliland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stevens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
• State v. Kock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-30· cited 91×
• State v. Schellhorn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-22· cited 24×
• State v. Nicholson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-01-27· cited 19×
• State v. Hicks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-02-10· cited 11×
• State v. Bass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-06· cited 4×
• State v. Wales
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-05-11· cited 4×
• State v. Ehly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-10-30· cited 3×