District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/19/1981
State v. Parker
Citations
- 399 So. 2d 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- illegal search to enter fenced backyard as it was not accessible to the public and more private than the front
- enclosed backyard is zone of privacy for fourth amendment purposes, and the backyard is more private than the front yard because the backyard cannot be seen by those passing by the front of the house
- enclosed backyard is zone of privacy for fourth amendment purposes, and the backyard is more private than the front yard because the backyard cannot be seen by those passing by the front of the house
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Schwartz and Ferguson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CelusniakNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-04-15· cited 33×
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-05· cited 30×
- Bank of Coushatta v. PatrickLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-02-25· cited 28×
- Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-11· cited 24×
- Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-12· cited 15×
- State v. McLaughlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-05· cited 11×
- State v. SarantopoulosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-26· cited 11×
- L.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-12· cited 8×
- DeMontmorency v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-07-10· cited 7×
- State v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-03· cited 7×
- M.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-03· cited 4×
- Mobley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-29· cited 1×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-03-08· cited 1×
- State v. SliferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-18· cited 1×
- State v. BarrowcloughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-06· cited 1×
- Morejon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-17
- ML v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-03
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 1,768×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,044×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 919×
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Gary Bowdach, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 199×
- United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyFifth Circuit· 1972-04-21· cited 155×
- Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-01-24· cited 148×
- Spinkellink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-02-19· cited 130×
- Hornblower v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-10-27· cited 85×
- Robert Fixel v. Louie L. WainwrightFifth Circuit· 1974-04-10· cited 77×
- State v. OliverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-13· cited 75×
- Shapiro v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-11-13· cited 63×
- State v. MorsmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-08· cited 60×
- Pomerantz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-15· cited 29×
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-01-23· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.