State v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the use of the term \ordinarily” in Maryland Rule 8-131(b) \implies that this Court possesses the discretion to consider issues that were not necessarily raised in the petition or order for a [w]rit of [c]ertiorari.”
• concluding that the use of the term “ordinarily” in Maryland Rule 8-131(b) “implies that this Court possesses the discretion to consider issues that were not necessarily raised in the petition or order for a [w]rit of [c]ertiorari.”
• stating that “contract principles should generally guide the determination of the proper remedy of a broken plea agreement” yet “contract principles alone will not suffice”
• stating that \contract principles should generally guide the determination of the proper remedy of a broken plea agreement\ yet \contract principles alone will not suffice\
• concluding that when the Court lacked jurisdiction to enforce an integral portion of defendant’s plea agreement, the defendant could either leave the guilty plea in place or -withdraw the plea, so that the State could proceed on all of the original charges
• explaining that parole does not constitute service of sentence such that another sentence can be imposed to run consecutively to parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-11· cited 75×
• Yancy v. Shatzer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-09-16· cited 72×
• State v. Broberg
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-11· cited 52×
• Cuffley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-28· cited 47×
• State v. Roshchin
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-26· cited 43×
• Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Downey Communications, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-26· cited 40×
• In Re: O.P.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-14· cited 35×
• People v. Caban
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-01-12· cited 34×
• State v. Tabone
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 34×
• Carroll County Ethics Commission v. Lennon
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-08· cited 34×
• Robinson v. Bunch
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-11· cited 32×
• Tweedy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-06· cited 31×
• Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. Demby
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-01-17· cited 30×
• Hammen v. Baltimore County Police Department
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-14· cited 30×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-13· cited 29×
• In Re Blessen H.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-11· cited 26×
• Solorzano v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-19· cited 23×
• Carlini v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-18· cited 22×
• Stevenson v. Lanham
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-01· cited 21×
• Matter of Dortch
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-04-14· cited 18×