Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/1/1983
State v. Paradise
Citations
- 189 Conn. 346
- 456 A.2d 305
- 1983 Conn. LEXIS 449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \statutes of limitation in criminal cases are to be construed liberally in favor of the accused\
- “statutes of limitation in criminal cases are to be construed liberally in favor of the accused”
- absent clear language necessitating retroactive effect, criminal statute of limitations will be applied prospectively; court did not decide whether statute of limitations is procedural or substantive
- absent clear language necessitating retroactive effect, criminal statute of limitations will be applied prospectively; court did not decide whether statute of limitations is procedural or substantive
- “[t]he state cannot point to anything in the language of the statute or in its legislative history that expresses such an intent” [emphasis added]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Speziale, Peters, Healey, Parskey, Grillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-08· cited 232×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 192×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 146×
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 134×
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-21· cited 111×
- State v. James G.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-13· cited 89×
- State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-01· cited 88×
- State v. ParadiseSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-02· cited 75×
- Citizens Against Pollution Northwest, Inc. v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-01-15· cited 72×
- United States v. Bridget M. Denny-ShafferTenth Circuit· 1993-08-09· cited 68×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-12-09· cited 67×
- State v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-05-13· cited 63×
- People v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. BargeronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-14· cited 59×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 52×
- State v. LizotteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 47×
- State v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-16· cited 47×
- Mulrooney v. WamboltSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-05· cited 43×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-08-01· cited 108×
- Reino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-10-27· cited 102×
- Jones Destruction, Inc. v. UpjohnSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-05-11· cited 100×
- City of New Haven v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-01-15· cited 81×
- Kenneth E. Waters v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1964-03-04· cited 77×
- American Masons' Supply Co. v. F. W. Brown Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-02-07· cited 75×
- Lavieri v. UlyssesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-04-05· cited 59×
- State v. FogelCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-01-17· cited 52×
- State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-06-13· cited 51×
- Carvette v. Marion Power Shovel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-10-23· cited 36×
- East Village Associates, Inc. v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-07-26· cited 25×
- Baston v. RicciSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-04-04· cited 20×
- Madison Education Ass'n v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-01-17· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.