Nebraska Supreme Court· 9/24/1999
State v. Palmer
Citations
- 600 N.W.2d 756
- 257 Neb. 702
- 1999 Neb. LEXIS 167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the defendant's allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel were moot because the court reversed the convictions from the two trials to which his allegations related
- the defendantâs allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel were moot because the court reversed the convictions from the two trials to which his allegations related
- explicitly holding that double jeopardy concerns apply in Nebraska sentencing hearings
- explicitly holding that double jeopardy concerns apply in Nebraska sentencing hearings
- “Palmer IV” or “state post-conviction action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Mues, Stephan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. McCullochNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-12-14· cited 263×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-02-08· cited 248×
- State v. GalindoNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-10-09· cited 186×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-09-05· cited 121×
- State v. TorresNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-02-17· cited 110×
- State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-04-14· cited 93×
- State v. DavlinNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-03-01· cited 82×
- State v. El-TabechNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-05-19· cited 80×
- State v. NesbittNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-09-13· cited 67×
- State v. HochsteinNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-08-03· cited 55×
- State v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-01-21· cited 50×
- State v. LyleNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-12-03· cited 42×
- State v. WelchNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-04-18· cited 29×
- State v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-11-20· cited 27×
- State v. McCroyNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-06-16· cited 21×
- People v. ChipmanColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08· cited 18×
- State v. BrunzoNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-09-28· cited 16×
- State v. SuggsNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-06-16· cited 13×
- Palmer v. ClarkeD. Nebraska· 2003-10-09· cited 10×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-02-21· cited 4×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,706×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. BallSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,367×
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1981-05-04· cited 875×
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 589×
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court· 1965-10-11· cited 529×
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 481×
- Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1883-04-18· cited 472×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research GroupSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 370×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.