State v. Pailin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not believe, however, that Rule 609(b) establishes a rebuttable presumption that would preclude the use of misdemeanors that do not involve dishonesty or false statements for impeachment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bertram
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1991-05-06· cited 52×
• State v. Gatone
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-07-25· cited 38×
• State v. Gillespie
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-12-03· cited 29×
• State v. Remy
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2006-11-30· cited 15×
• State v. Scholl
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1995-06-23· cited 10×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-11-05· cited 10×
• State v. Gasparico
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-08-05· cited 10×
• State v. Gongoleski
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-03-18· cited 9×
• Spratt v. State
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-04-13· cited 3×