State v. Pack

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 1522

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for obstructing official business was supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence where the state presented testimony and evidence from which the trier of fact could find his actions hampered or impeded the official duties of the arresting officers. Contrary to appellant's arguments, there is no requirement for a \substantial stoppage\ of an officer's progress in order to find a defendant guilty of obstruction of official business.