State v. Pack
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5210
Syllabus
The trial court correctly found that a federal agent was not required to re-administer Miranda warnings and obtain a waiver prior to interviewing the appellant at the police department. Kettering police officers had advised the appellant of his Miranda rights and obtained a waiver less than two hours earlier at the scene of a traffic stop, and that advisement and waiver were not \stale\ when the agent interviewed the appellant. In addition, the appellant's challenges to the length of his 12-month prison sentence and to the calculation of jail-time credit are moot because he already has completed the sentence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-03· cited 17×
- State v. PenceOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 9×
- State v. EleyetOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-07· cited 9×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-03· cited 6×
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-13· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.