Washington Supreme Court· 3/28/1996
State v. Owens
Citations
- 128 Wash. 2d 908
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the victim's particular statements did not qualify for this hearsay exception
- holding the victim’s particular statements did not qualify for this hearsay exception
- purpose of URESA is to provide a single, convenient, and uniform interstate proceeding to obtain support and should not be burdened with collateral issues such as custody and visitation
- trial court erred in admitting statement as excited utterance where statement was made “after some time had elapsed” and after declarant was comforted by grandmother
- purpose of URE-SA is to provide a single, convenient, and uniform interstate proceeding to obtain support and should not be burdened with collateral issues such as custody and visitation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People Ex Rel. R.L.H.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-07-24· cited 308×
- State v. GordonTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-09-29· cited 91×
- Matter of Dependency of AEPWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 51×
- In re Dependency of A.E.P.Washington Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 49×
- State v. HamletWashington Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 24×
- State v. OwensWashington Supreme Court· 1996-03-28· cited 14×
- Ostermiller v. SpurrWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-12-10· cited 8×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- State v. StraussWashington Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 143×
- State v. ChapinWashington Supreme Court· 1992-03-19· cited 100×
- Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court· 1969-07-17· cited 89×
- State v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-10-05· cited 28×
- State v. McKinseyWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 26×
- State v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-21· cited 22×
- State of Washington v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.