Skip to main content

State v. Outen

Citations

  • 296 Ga. 40
  • 764 S.E.2d 848
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that for purposes of the statute of limitation, an amending charging instrument will relate back to the date of the prior charging instrument if: “(1) the prior [charging instrument] was timely; (2) the prior [charging instrument] is still pending; and (3
  • subsequent indictment relates back to date of timely, still-pending prior indictment if \the later indictment does not broaden or otherwise substantially amend the original charges\
  • subsequent indictment relates back to date of timely, still-pending prior indictment if “the later indictment does not broaden or otherwise substantially amend the original charges”
  • relation-back doctrine applies where, among other things, “the prior indictment is still pending”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.