State v. Oster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The heart of the rule is simply that there must be evidence, independent of the evidence of the accomplice, which would lead reasonable minds to a belief that the defendant criminally participated in the crime charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McLean
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-04-22· cited 68×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-02-05· cited 12×
• State v. Oster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-11-07· cited 8×
• State v. Riley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-05-31· cited 6×
• State v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-02· cited 4×
• State v. Banks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-07-01· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brake
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1921-02-15· cited 58×
• State v. Jensen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1957-01-16· cited 46×
• State v. Scott
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1895-10-28· cited 22×