State v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, although the defendant possessed scales, a rental car, and a large amount of cash with a residual drug odor, nothing in the record connected that evidence to drugs found in his housemate and alleged accomplice’s car
• evidence of mere possession of items that drug dealers often possess “is analogous to evidence that merely shows an association between a defendant and accomplices, without evidence that the circumstances of the association would be unlikely to arise except for the criminal activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. B. M. L.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-27· cited 3×
• State v. ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 2×
• State v. Lunetta
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 1×
• State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Bml
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Walton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 149×
• State v. Brake
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1921-02-15· cited 58×
• State v. Caldwell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-09-22· cited 25×
• State v. Carroll
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-09-18· cited 20×
• State v. Boone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-06· cited 10×
• State v. Torres
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-08-23· cited 9×
• State v. Boone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-10-17· cited 9×
• State v. Oster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-11-07· cited 7×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-03-05· cited 6×