Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/23/2021

State v. Osborne

Citations

2021 Ohio 3352

Syllabus

R.C. 2929.13(D) presumption of prison R.C. 2929.18 restitution competent, credible evidence. - Trial court followed the presumption of prison therefore, it was not required to issue any findings pursuant to R.C. 2929.13(D). Trial court's restitution award was not supported by competent, credible evidence and may have been greater than the economic loss suffered as prohibited by R.C. 2929.18.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Robinson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-21· cited 17×
State v. Klimczyk
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-19· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Lalain
Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-07-17· cited 102×
State v. Willard
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-26· cited 30×
State v. Roberts
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-16· cited 7×
State v. Starr
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-10· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.