Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/7/2007
State v. Osborne
Citations
- 140 Wash. App. 38
- 163 P.3d 799
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court may not require restitution beyond the crime charged if the defendant did not expressly agree to pay restitution or if the state failed to establish a causal connection between the crime and damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 104×
- State v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-03· cited 54×
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-17· cited 53×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-27· cited 50×
- State v. DedonadoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-31· cited 45×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-27· cited 28×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-14· cited 26×
- State v. DauenhauerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-16· cited 26×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-06-12· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.