State v. Dedonado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating portions of the restitution order because the State failed to establish a causal connection between defendant's actions and the damages
• vacating portions of the restitution order because the State failed to establish a causal connection between defendant’s actions and the damages
• reversing an award of restitution where the State did not show a causal connection between the defendant’s offense and the damages
• causal connection is not established simply because the victim or insurer submits a list of expenditures, without more
• causal connection is not established simply because the victim or insurer submits a list of expenditures, without more
• “The State did not meet its burden of proving the restitution amounts here . . . because the documentation it provided did not establish a causal connection between Dedonado’s actions and the damages.” 9 No. 83052-0-I/10 (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).