Skip to main content

State v. O'Neal

Citations

  • 159 Wash. 2d 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • limiting the inquiry to the sufficiency of the evidence when there has been no challenge to the jury instructions
  • limiting the inquiry to the sufficiency of the evidence when there has been no challenge to the jury instructions
  • requiring a Franks hearing when the defendant makes a preliminary showing that an officer made a false statement in applying for a warrant and the “false statement was necessary to a finding of probable cause”
  • “Direct evidence is not required to uphold a jury’s verdict; circumstantial evidence can be sufficient.”
  • “Direct evidence is not required to uphold a jury’s verdict; circumstantial evidence can be sufficient.”
  • “Direct evidence is not required to uphold a jury’s verdict; circumstantial evidence can be sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.