State v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Offenses may be charged together, under SDCL 23A-6-23 [where] ‘two or more acts or transactions [are] connected together or constitute] parts of a common scheme or plan.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Moeller
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-22· cited 85×
• State v. Thompson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 47×
• State v. Svihl
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 31×
• State v. Brings Plenty
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-07-29· cited 21×
• State v. Benoit
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-06-23· cited 16×
• People v. Robledo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1992-07-13· cited 11×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Kentucky v. Stincer
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,461×
• United States v. Henry
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
• State v. Miller
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-03· cited 71×
• State v. West
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 42×
• State v. Layton
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-08-24· cited 39×
• State v. Cady
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 35×
• State v. Banks
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 34×
• State v. Johnson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1972-11-21· cited 23×
• Satter v. Solem
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-01-04· cited 20×
• State v. LaRue
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-04-21· cited 15×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-03-23· cited 12×
• Whitfield v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-04-11· cited 11×
• Walker v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 8×
• Bailey v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1980-08-07· cited 7×