State v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the court may not resort to judicial construction in order to rectify what may appear to be an unfair and injudicious result.\
• former RCW 8.25.070's unambiguous language mandates that under subsection (l)(b) trial judgment exceed by 10 percent highest written offer made at least 30 days before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Costich
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-10-07· cited 128×
• Daviscourt v. Peistrup
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-24· cited 31×
• I-5 Truck Sales & Service Co. v. Underwood
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-05-21· cited 22×
• McFreeze Corp. v. State, Dept. of Revenue
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-25· cited 21×
• McFreeze Corp. v. Department of Revenue
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-25· cited 20×
• Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. Thoeny
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-23· cited 18×
• City of SeaTac v. Cassan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-12-07· cited 8×
• State ex rel. State Convention & Trade Center v. Allerdice
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-05· cited 6×
• STATE EX REL. CONVENTION CTR. v. Allerdice
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-05· cited 5×
• State v. Claypool
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-02· cited 5×
• State v. Costich
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-19· cited 5×
• Frank v. Fischer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-08· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• King County v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-03-31· cited 71×
• State v. Spino
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-01-17· cited 65×
• Anderson v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-06-18· cited 59×
• Port of Seattle v. Rio
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-01-10· cited 11×