Idaho Court of Appeals· 5/31/1991
State v. Oakley
Citations
- 812 P.2d 313
- 119 Idaho 1006
- 1991 Ida. App. LEXIS 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where a portion of affidavit is redacted the court should consider the rest of the affidavit as a whole to determine probable cause
- where a portion of affidavit is redacted the court should consider the rest of the affidavit as a whole to determine probable cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Silak, Walters, Swanstrom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'BrienNinth Circuit· 1991-01-08· cited 167×
- State v. CrawfordIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 55×
- State v. CowenIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-04-18· cited 47×
- State v. BurrisIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-10-24· cited 25×
- State v. LedbetterIdaho Court of Appeals· 1990-01-03· cited 21×
- State v. RubioIdaho Court of Appeals· 1989-02-17· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.