New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/25/1986

State v. Nunez

Citations

506 A.2d 1295
209 N.J. Super. 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[I]t is clear that a defendant cannot call a witness solely for the purpose of having him assert his 12 Fifth Amendment rights before the jury.”
“[T]he jury is not entitled to draw any inference from the decision of a witness to exercise his constitutional privilege whether those inferences be favorable to the prosecution or the defense.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
substantial evidence of shared intent warrants accomplice instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Morton I. Greenberg, J.H. Coleman and Long

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.