State v. Nunez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district attorney’s notes are not work-product because they did not contain theories, opinions, or conclusions as the state statute defining work-product requires
• holding that the district attorney's notes are not work-product because they did not contain theories, opinions, or conclusions as the state statute defining work-product requires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Reid
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-11-05· cited 72×
• Lisle v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-06-17· cited 64×
• State v. Jessen
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-29· cited 59×
• Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Wyoming Highway Department
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1978-07-18· cited 18×
• State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-28· cited 2×
• State of Arizona v. James Clayton Johnson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2019-08-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kelly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-09-23· cited 87×
• State v. Moore
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-04-07· cited 46×
• State v. Cumbo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-03-04· cited 20×