Arizona Supreme Court· 5/31/1973
State v. Nunez
Citations
- 510 P.2d 380
- 109 Ariz. 408
- 1973 Ariz. LEXIS 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A plea bargain properly entered into and adhered to by the parties should not be set aside because of changes in the law occurring after the plea.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Hays, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court· 1987-12-04· cited 70×
- State v. BengeArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-04· cited 56×
- Roy Louis Rodriguez v. James R. RickettsNinth Circuit· 1986-09-02· cited 27×
- State v. DruryArizona Supreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 27×
- State v. NunezArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 14×
- State v. ParleArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-24· cited 9×
- State v. BojorquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-11-25· cited 2×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1968-04-08· cited 1,409×
- Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 759×
- State v. DarlingArizona Supreme Court· 1973-03-01· cited 70×
- State v. MastersArizona Supreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 22×
- Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1970-02-25· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.